outsourcing | Buying Quality Performance

The Kabul model

Posted by Richard Johnson on June 20, 2018 · 1 Comment

The Ministry of Labour Social Affairs Martyrs & Disabled (MoLSAMD) in Afghanistan (the equivalent of DWP in the UK or DEEWR in Australia), with technical assistance from the World Bank, are about to begin the contracting of two pilot employment programmes. One aims to open up a formal migration channel for thousands of Afghanistan workers … Continue reading →

Filed under Afghanistan, Contract design, Outsourcing, poverty, Service design, Skills, Welfare to work, World Bank · Tagged with bottom-up, employers, fragile states, inputs versus outputs versus outcomes, jobs, labour markets, long-term unemployment, markets, migration, outcome-based contracting. payment by results, outcomes, outsourcing, place, poverty, price competition, top-down, unemployment, vocational training, youth unemployment

Misguided or misleading?

Posted by Richard Johnson on August 8, 2014 · 1 Comment

The Justice Secretary, Chris Grayling, rightly praises the achievements of the Peterborough and Doncaster pilots for their impact on reoffending rates. But is his suggestion that the national outsourcing of probation services will resemble these pilots worryingly misguided or purposefully misleading? http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/07/prisoners-reoffend-coalition-cycle-probation-service-support These two small pilot programmes have been working with offenders sentenced to less … Continue reading →

Filed under Contract design, Ministry of Justice, Outsourcing, Probation · Tagged with austerity, Chris Grayling, Community Rehabilitation Companies, outsourcing, payment by results, Peterborough, probation, recidivism, reoffending, Social Impact Bond

Search for:
Archives
Tags
A4E accountability AME austerity Australia better off in work black box choice Chris Grayling commissioning Community Rehabilitation Companies competition on price cost creaming and parking diversity DWP Employment Zone Employment Zones ERSA Flexible New Deal funding G4S impact inactivity Incapacity Benefit Independent Regulator inputs versus outputs versus outcomes investment Jobcentre Plus jobs localised long-term unemployed long-term unemployment Lord Freud markets minimum standards Minister for Employment multiple contractors New Deal Open Public Services outcome-based contracting outcome-based contracting. payment by results outcomes outsourcing payment by results performance management performance measurement place poverty price competition prime contractors prisons probation procurement Public Accounts Committee quality quality versus price recidivism Regulator rehabilitation revolution reliability reoffending risk Serco social cohesion social exclusion transparency unemployment US validity value for money Work experience Work for the Dole Work Programme youth unemployment
Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Email Address:
Links
Contact

If you would like to contact Richard or Jane, please email: buyingqp@gmail.com
Twitter
Tweets by buyingqp

Buying Quality Performance

Recent Posts

Categories

The Kabul model

Archives

Tags

Follow Blog via Email

Links

Contact

Twitter