Posted by Richard Johnson on May 22, 2013 · 1 Comment
The following piece appeared in The Guardian on 22nd May 2013. It is banging a drum we have been beating on here repeatedly. The underspend on the Work Programme (as noted in the Select Committee’s newly published report) is a stark example of a key point we are trying to make about the relationship between … Continue reading →
Filed under Contract design, Welfare to work, Work Programme · Tagged with austerity, benefit bill, benefits, creaming and parking, DWP, impact, liability, Lord Freud, outcome-based contracting, payment by results, quality versus price, risk, Treasury, unemployment, value for money, Work and Pensions Select Committee, Work Programme
Posted by Richard Johnson on April 12, 2013 · 1 Comment
In her last post, Jane talked about how an exclusive focus on cost in the reform of public services is to the detriment of the value of those services. Far from delivering ‘value for money’, a blinkered focus on short-term ‘savings’, and consequent loss of value, may ultimately drive up long-term cost. In the last … Continue reading →
Filed under Contract design, Welfare to work, Work Programme · Tagged with AME, austerity, competition on price, cost, DEL, DWP, inputs versus outputs versus outcomes, Lord Freud, outcome-based contracting, outcome-based contracting. payment by results, recidivism, unemployment, value for money, Work Programme