Posted by Richard Johnson on July 5, 2017 · 2 Comments
Whatever the enquiry finds, it is without doubt that Grenfell Tower went up like a dry stick because its refurbishment was procured at least in part on the basis of price. If the same fire had started in one of the gleaming new blocks in London’s docklands, it would not have spread. The people buying … Continue reading →
Filed under Contract design, Outsourcing, poverty, Prisons, Service design, Social Impact Bond, Social investment, Value for money, Welfare to work, Work and Health Programme, Work Programme · Tagged with accountability, austerity, commissioning, competition on price, creaming and parking, Grenfell Tower, impact, long-term unemployed, recidivism, social exclusion, unemployment, value for money, Work Programme
Buying Quality Performance · What we pay and how we pay it determines the efficiency, effectiveness and social impact of our public services.
Buying Quality Performance