Posted by Richard Johnson on September 1, 2014 · 2 Comments
Is a Social Serco possible? Challenging the public sector monopoly on some public services has the potential to deliver better social impact. However, the difficulty in opening a public sector market to competition from other sectors is that market making is an inherent feature of the private sector. Public and third sectors, apparently, are not … Continue reading →
Filed under Outsourcing, Social investment, Social Prime, Value for money · Tagged with business development, Cabinet Office, competition on price, impact, Investment and Contract Readiness Fund, Open Public Services, outcome-based contracting, payment by results, prime contractors, public monopoly, risk, Serco, social investors, social prime, transparency, value for money
Buying Quality Performance · What we pay and how we pay it determines the efficiency, effectiveness and social impact of our public services.
Buying Quality Performance