Payment model not panacea
I was recently interviewed as part of a series on Payment by Results in public services – you can see the interview here:
Archives
- October 2020
- May 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- February 2019
- July 2018
- June 2018
- October 2017
- July 2017
- March 2017
- November 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- April 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- January 2015
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
Tags
A4E accountability AME austerity Australia better off in work black box choice Chris Grayling commissioning Community Rehabilitation Companies competition on price cost creaming and parking diversity DWP Employment Zone Employment Zones ERSA Flexible New Deal funding G4S impact inactivity Incapacity Benefit Independent Regulator inputs versus outputs versus outcomes investment Jobcentre Plus jobs localised long-term unemployed long-term unemployment Lord Freud markets minimum standards Minister for Employment multiple contractors New Deal Open Public Services outcome-based contracting outcome-based contracting. payment by results outcomes outsourcing payment by results performance management performance measurement place poverty price competition prime contractors prisons probation procurement Public Accounts Committee quality quality versus price recidivism Regulator rehabilitation revolution reliability reoffending risk Serco social cohesion social exclusion transparency unemployment US validity value for money Work experience Work for the Dole Work Programme youth unemployment-
Links
Contact
If you would like to contact Richard or Jane, please email: buyingqp@gmail.comTwitter
Tweets by buyingqp
Buying Quality Performance 
Comments
One Response to “Payment model not panacea”Trackbacks
Check out what others are saying...[…] “Public bodies seem to be pursuing the use of payment by results with the vigour of a drunk in search of the next bottle of alcohol” Harrowing warning about the shortcomings of payment by results, by John Tizard at PublicFinance.co.uk. Although with enough funding and flexibility, can succeed, without being a panacea; says Jane Mansour. […]